Central Virginia
  • City of Charlottesville
  • Board of Architectural Review Meeting 4/15/2025
  • Auto-scroll

Board of Architectural Review Meeting   4/15/2025

Attachments
  • BAR Agenda April 2025.pdf
  • BAR Packet April 2025.pdf
  • Board of Architectural Review Minutes.pdf
    • SPEAKER_09
    • 00:33:33
      Thank you.
    • 00:34:16
      Are you in a booth?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:35:01
      But don't trust him.
    • 00:35:03
      Listen to us.
    • 00:35:04
      Do the motion first.
    • 00:35:05
      You go home and then we're like, oh.
    • 00:35:06
      Convene the meeting and take the vote.
    • 00:35:09
      Trust and verify.
    • 00:35:09
      We'll be ready to roll.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:35:28
      So welcome to this regular monthly meeting of the Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review.
    • 00:35:33
      Staff will introduce each item, followed by the applicant's presentation, which should not exceed 10 minutes.
    • 00:35:39
      The chair will then ask questions from the public, followed by questions from the BAR.
    • 00:35:45
      After questions are closed, the chair will ask for comments from the public.
    • 00:35:49
      For each application, members of the public are each allowed three minutes to ask questions and three minutes to offer comments.
    • 00:35:56
      Speakers shall identify themselves and provide their address.
    • 00:36:00
      Comments should be limited to the BAR's purview, that is regarding only the exterior aspects of a project.
    • 00:36:06
      Following the BAR's discussion and prior to taking action, the applicant will have up to three minutes to respond.
    • 00:36:22
      So first up, matters from the public not on the agenda or on the consent agenda?
    • 00:36:31
      Anybody tuning in?
    • 00:36:32
      OK.
    • 00:36:37
      So we'll move on to the consent agenda.
    • 00:36:40
      I move to approve the consent agenda.
    • 00:36:41
      Second.
    • 00:36:42
      All right.
    • 00:36:47
      Everyone in favor say aye.
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 00:36:49
      Aye.
    • 00:36:50
      Aye.
    • 00:36:50
      Aye.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:36:57
      So for everyone out there on Channel 10, with the consent agenda, the COA was approved for the driveway at 712 Ridge Street, using the motion that's in the staff report.
    • 00:37:17
      The COA for the replacement of the windows at 516 Ridge Street is approved and the COA request for 300 Court Square, the COA is approved for the Portico addition and the rear deck and with the language proposed in the staff report for the motion for approval.
    • 00:37:38
      So those, all three are good to go.
    • 00:37:44
      We have no deferred items and we had no new items, but just to follow up with the rest of you, I spoke with the chairs last week.
    • 00:37:58
      We had a request for 218 West Market Street to come back.
    • 00:38:09
      The application was not complete in regards to the things I had asked for, but I told the applicant that it's, you know, I appreciate their interest in continuing to move forward.
    • 00:38:24
      I just cautioned that
    • 00:38:28
      to be respectful of the BAR's position that we all want to try and help move things forward, but at some point the conversation just becomes an endless conversation.
    • 00:38:43
      So I urge them to
    • 00:38:46
      to develop their drawings more so that it could be an application that I could accept as complete to bring forward to you all.
    • 00:38:56
      I had also offered- And just to- Yes, ma'am.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:38:59
      This is the heirloom development, what we've been calling the Artful Watcher project, for lack of a better word.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:39:06
      Right.
    • 00:39:07
      and the owner is not heirloom, but Mr. Levine has been the face of development, so I don't know what the composition of that team is, but the owner is a family enrichment.
    • 00:39:24
      Similarly with the Tent and Workland project, which you all had some discussion with,
    • 00:39:30
      We know the circumstances on that and some deadlines relative to affordable housing funding that they're seeking, but they weren't ready to bring anything forward tonight, so we'll likely see that in May.
    • 00:39:46
      And then I had on other business, I have not
    • 00:39:54
      I don't have this officially but I will say it and Ms.
    • 00:39:59
      Lewis you've been asking this and I appreciate you asking.
    • 00:40:05
      In consultation with legal they view the CLA extensions as you get a 12 month extension and then after that so has
    • 00:40:19
      So from here on, if someone wants an extension and they've, in addition to any extensions that have currently been approved, that can only be allowed, either the COA expires or they can
    • 00:40:39
      Are you saying no extensions at all?
    • 00:40:42
      One.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:40:59
      Under Virginia law, that's how it was.
    • 00:41:04
      So in other words, I was correct?
    • 00:41:06
      Are you trying to say when pointing that out to the city?
    • 00:41:09
      Because it was asserted that I was wrong.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:41:13
      No, no, I just said that that's what we've been doing, but I was going to ask legal where they were.
    • 00:41:21
      However, it's been done and for whatever reason, I know COVID made things really odd for a while, but that is a just like legal determinant that we can't do.
    • 00:41:34
      incremental COAs, their instruction now is you can request an extension and indicating one.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:41:48
      Both the city code and the code of Virginia say there can only be a 12 month extension period.
    • 00:41:53
      We haven't had a city attorney and it's not on any of staff here.
    • 00:42:01
      but that proceeded.
    • Carl SchwarzPlanning Commission Representative, Board of Architectural Review
    • 00:42:03
      To clarify, once you have an approved site plan, though, it sticks with the site plan?
    • 00:42:07
      And that's good for, what, five years?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:42:10
      Yeah.
    • Carl SchwarzPlanning Commission Representative, Board of Architectural Review
    • 00:42:10
      OK.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:42:10
      So as I said, it's likely that sort of as I came in 2018, it was sort of like, well, here's how we do things.
    • 00:42:19
      And I did it as sort of I was told to me.
    • 00:42:25
      But from here forward, this is the interpretation of that.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:42:32
      So then what happens if it goes beyond the second year?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:42:36
      Well, if it goes beyond, they have an option to, the applicant, the remedy is to request, you know, reapply for a COA.
    • 00:42:44
      So it's not a battle.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:42:46
      Just like these applicants have to tonight.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:42:49
      Yeah, it doesn't affect them.
    • 00:42:51
      It has nothing to do with them.
    • 00:42:54
      So that's moving forward.
    • 00:43:00
      Yeah, there's been quite a couple projects that for various reasons have been extended and so from here on now and it said to be clear it's not saying oh now you suddenly can't do something.
    • 00:43:14
      No, the remedy is to apply for a COA and I was after the conversations we've been having the last couple months
    • 00:43:26
      I was leaning towards, well, there's a threshold at which, you know, I'm going to say we're going to the BAR no matter what.
    • 00:43:35
      But I hopefully will have the final, whatever the specific from legal is, but I don't have that at that point, but I wanted to share that with you.
    • 00:43:49
      144 Chancellor Street.
    • 00:43:52
      I had to bump that now to the first meeting in
    • 00:43:59
      May, yeah.
    • 00:44:03
      And I can update you on that as we get closer.
    • 00:44:08
      Mr. Timmerman and I have talked, probably appropriate for him to be there as the chair that evening.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:44:17
      Not Mr. Zehmer?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:44:18
      What's that?
    • 00:44:18
      Not Mr. Zehmer?
    • 00:44:20
      He participated via email that night.
    • 00:44:24
      Yeah, he wasn't there, remember?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:44:26
      I meant for May, for when this
    • 00:44:29
      So it's already gone before council?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:44:30
      No, it'll go on that first Monday meeting, whatever the first Monday meeting is.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:44:36
      So James isn't available as our chair?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:44:39
      Well, because he presided over the meeting, I figured.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:44:43
      He got double jeopardy.
    • 00:44:47
      No good deeds were punished.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:44:50
      We read his notes, but he wasn't present.
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 00:44:53
      Jeff, I want to go back to 2.18.
    • 00:44:55
      What were, I forget, what were the changes that you wanted?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:45:03
      So there weren't any changes and this is, and I'll read, well I shouldn't say I'll read from the code because I'll flip back and forth for it, but the, we have a standard, the procedure for
    • 00:45:21
      Me bringing something to you all is that, and I will cite from the code, section 5.2.1, C.3, sorry, 4B.
    • 00:45:43
      under completeness determination.
    • 00:45:45
      An application is considered complete when it contains all the information necessary to decide whether or not the application will comply with the applicable requirements of the code.
    • 00:45:57
      So this is where
    • 00:46:01
      and I'll use an example of the 200 West Main where the applicant wants a certain height and at times folks would say well he should just submit something let the BAR deny it and then go appeal to council.
    • 00:46:16
      Well you all don't see it unless I and I mean it's very rare but if I don't think it's a complete application I'm not bringing it to you for action.
    • 00:46:29
      That's where you've seen in the last couple months where I'll say, this isn't ready, but I try not to make the decision on whether you all are willing to discuss it.
    • 00:46:41
      Because even at, like we had, I'm sorry, the months are merging together in my head.
    • 00:46:51
      So if I think there's something to benefit from, even in
    • 00:46:56
      that, I'm not sure what to call it, but an informal discussion.
    • 00:47:00
      No action will be taken.
    • 00:47:03
      Then I'll talk about that.
    • 00:47:05
      And that's where I said I'd talk to the chairs about 218, whether to bring it forward.
    • 00:47:13
      In the past, it had been sort of, if someone gets something in by the deadline, then they assumed it would be
    • 00:47:22
      get on the next meeting agenda and I took a lot of pride in making sure those things kept moving.
    • 00:47:31
      But some of these larger projects we've seen, I have great illustrations of what your building's gonna look like, but I don't have measured drawings, I don't have an elevation, I don't have wall sections, you haven't told me what the materials are.
    • 00:47:49
      The difficult position I'm in is that I have to decide is this complete or not.
    • 00:47:57
      It's not always, sometimes it's crystal clear, but sometimes it's a little fuzzy.
    • 00:48:01
      So in this case, some very basic information they need to provide.
    • 00:48:06
      So it hasn't been changes, it has been how have they presented the information that will allow you all to make a decision.
    • 00:48:14
      So that's where we are.
    • 00:48:16
      And I did talk to
    • 00:48:23
      Jeff Levine, and I said to him that, relative to 218, I said, you know, now when Mr. Pinnio came in, and I know he took up a lot of time, I said, but I don't think anybody on the BAR
    • 00:48:36
      was actually troubled because it was really interesting the perspective he brought.
    • 00:48:40
      I said it was a very good lesson in sort of seeing the ball and how, you know, that extension of the ball.
    • 00:48:48
      I said, however, you know, while it was a very interesting conversation, it didn't present what we needed to make a decision on the design.
    • 00:48:57
      So that's where we are.
    • 00:48:59
      Does that make sense?
    • 00:49:02
      And then
    • 00:49:07
      So I really want to keep you guys as short as possible tonight, but I had, I do have some, did I, is it sticking out of my head?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:49:25
      Are we on bullet point three?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:49:29
      Yeah, please tell me what I,
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:49:31
      Have we started that?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:49:33
      I believe so.
    • 00:49:34
      Section 34.5, does that have to do with the limit?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:49:43
      Okay, I'm going to close my eyes and count to ten, and then it's going to appear right in front of me.
    • 00:49:49
      There it is.
    • 00:49:52
      So the third bullet.
    • 00:50:01
      I need to draft something for this, but when it says, for example, for applications that have previously been reviewed by the BAR, if the BAR has authorized final review by the administrator, and then
    • 00:50:26
      It used to then for number B applications for new construction or accessory buildings or additions or alterations to primary structures determined to be minor alterations by the BAR.
    • 00:50:38
      That had in our prior code said after consultation with the BAR chair and for the BAR chairs and this is
    • 00:50:50
      Again, these are for minor historic reviews, so not something, a large project that I bring to you.
    • 00:50:56
      So I'm going to see if I can resolve this with a policy adjustment, and so I just wanted to ask you before I
    • 00:51:09
      drafted that up.
    • 00:51:11
      So just taking the first one, applications that have been previously reviewed by the BAR, if the BAR has authorized final review by the administrator, would you all be comfortable, and obviously I'm not going to just change it myself, but to treat that as
    • 00:51:35
      That review, it's been discussed by.
    • 00:51:37
      We've had, if I brought something to you all and you say, and you have said, Jeff, I think you know what, we're fine with you okaying that, or yeah, something, that fence type of thing, where I brought it to you as a question,
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:51:57
      I'll start on this.
    • 00:52:00
      There are often times when we qualify a statement with certain things we want to see or certain issues we want to see resolved.
    • 00:52:10
      So I don't know if there's ever a case where you're doing the final review administratively, but then there's also these kind of qualifications linked to that.
    • 00:52:22
      Maybe that's a distinction to be made.
    • 00:52:26
      If we as a board ask to see a brick color or some kind of a mock-up or whatever it is to follow up upon a review, I think we should all be able to see it and give it a chance.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:52:42
      That's a good point.
    • 00:52:46
      because I don't want to cross the line and just say, well, yeah, I ran into Mr. Timmerman on the law, and he said he was good with it.
    • 00:52:53
      But there are, and again, this is primarily for these minor historic reviews, and what happened is where there had been clarity within the conservation districts, things got kind of lumped together, and whereas the conservation districts
    • 00:53:11
      All I had to do was ask the BAR chairs, and they've changed it to buy the BAR, so I'm betting chairs just got left out of there, but were you all, did you have any issues with that?
    • 00:53:32
      I'm going to draft something and see if we can get that in as a policy.
    • 00:53:43
      I left my list in my office but I wanted to share with you just a couple things looking forward.
    • 00:53:55
      There's a large project that's been brought up on West Main Street in that empty lot just as you cross the bridge.
    • 00:54:04
      Finally.
    • Carl SchwarzPlanning Commission Representative, Board of Architectural Review
    • 00:54:06
      I just said finally.
    • 00:54:09
      The city's been hoping for something up there.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:54:16
      The only thing that came up in a pre-development conference is I raised that this sits up about 50, 60 feet above the 10th and Page neighborhood and that to really be cognizant of.
    • 00:54:31
      I said on the front side the height probably wouldn't, anybody would ask, I said but on that back side and I referred to, what's that?
    • Carl SchwarzPlanning Commission Representative, Board of Architectural Review
    • 00:54:41
      Is this the Dabney parking lot or is this the train station?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:54:45
      It's the parking lot there on the north side of West Main.
    • 00:54:52
      So I just said the shadow I think will be an issue.
    • 00:54:59
      They were responsive to that.
    • 00:55:02
      We'll see when that comes forward.
    • 00:55:04
      You have, I expect by no one application has already come in and it is for 1301 Wortland Street and it's to raise the Wortenbunner House.
    • SPEAKER_00
    • 00:55:15
      Raise the what?
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:55:16
      Oh really?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:55:17
      Yeah.
    • 00:55:17
      Interesting.
    • 00:55:18
      So that will likely be coming to you in May.
    • 00:55:23
      In some ways, if I can easy one, it's one of the oldest houses in
    • 00:55:29
      in the city.
    • 00:55:33
      This is the brick house on Wirtland that's set back.
    • 00:55:38
      I think it was the first or second librarian at the university built it.
    • 00:55:46
      Likely dates to around 1830, but so does that mean the project that we approved to wrap it is dead I I haven't I haven't been able to piece that together yet, but just so you know applicant or Is it the same applicant?
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:56:05
      It's the same owner and
    • 00:56:10
      So this address is?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:56:12
      They never did the apartment.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 00:56:13
      They never did the apartments, right?
    • 00:56:15
      Yeah.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:56:15
      Oh, my gosh.
    • 00:56:17
      And then at the opposite end of Wortland Street at 10th and Wortland, there's three houses in a row.
    • 00:56:24
      One is late 1800s, and then two are 1920s.
    • 00:56:29
      There's a development being proposed that would require raising those.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:56:34
      You mean it would be across the street from the new?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:56:39
      So it's going to be, I don't know.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 00:56:42
      Well, then you don't have to worry about the streak state anymore.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:56:46
      Yeah, yeah.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 00:56:48
      Did the university secretly buy all three of those recently?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:56:52
      No.
    • 00:56:53
      But, you know, speaking of things that are surprises, so I've been getting calls for the Federal Executive Institute.
    • 00:57:03
      Apparently that's been shuttered and the property's up for sale.
    • 00:57:10
      I must say, who's the architect?
    • 00:57:12
      I always think Ray Bradbury.
    • 00:57:18
      So there are some buildings in there that are eligible for the National Register, but its entrance quarter wouldn't affect you.
    • 00:57:27
      First time when people ask me, they'd say, well, what do you think?
    • 00:57:31
      I'd say, well, have you asked UVA?
    • 00:57:35
      I'm surprised they haven't swooped it up yet.
    • 00:57:38
      So there's some things that are coming up.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 00:57:41
      Didn't we review one of those houses, one of the three houses you're referring to?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:57:47
      You may have long ago, but not in my time.
    • Carl SchwarzPlanning Commission Representative, Board of Architectural Review
    • 00:57:51
      One of them like 20 years ago, the property owner wanted to move it closer to the street.
    • 00:57:57
      That happened when I was in grad school.
    • 00:58:00
      I think that was the last time I went over there.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 00:58:04
      Yeah, so that's, it's, some of these things are going to be coming to a head relative to, you know, I think the city deciding what are the, which direction does it wish to go.
    • 00:58:21
      And then, so that's what I've got coming and that's for admin reviews that we've knocked out lately.
    • 00:58:31
      There's, and I know I'm supposed to report to you on all of these, but there's a bowling alley going in at the northwest corner of the Derry Central building, and they're doing some work on their patio outside, but it's not a cafe space, so I don't treat it like that, but they've got
    • 00:58:52
      There's some things they want to do, nothing permanent, so I've okayed that administratively.
    • 00:59:01
      What else did we have that I had on my list that's in my office?
    • 00:59:08
      I don't think there's anything of consequence.
    • 00:59:11
      So the last thing I wanted to do and really take
    • 00:59:16
      15 minutes, half hour, and is that you all are, as you know, required to do an hour of training every year, and that is in order for the city of Charlottesville to maintain its CLG status.
    • 00:59:33
      And we are a certified local government.
    • 00:59:35
      In fact, there's even a plaque down on the wall underneath the clock.
    • 00:59:42
      certified local governments are a federal program where and it's administered by the state but essentially we have a historic ordinance, we established historic districts, we established a board of architectural review to review those historic districts and
    • 01:00:03
      then part of that requirement is that you all, every year, have one hour of training relative or germane to your job.
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 01:00:11
      I remembered one of the minor athletes reviews.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:00:15
      The what?
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 01:00:16
      The mosaic at University Circle in Toronto.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:00:19
      Oh, that's right.
    • 01:00:21
      Thank you.
    • 01:00:22
      I'll go back to that.
    • 01:00:23
      So what I've decided to do is last month we had a discussion for about a half hour on our process.
    • 01:00:30
      Tonight I'm going to talk 15, 20 minutes about conservation districts and I'll just keep track of that and so next February I won't have to chase you all down for your training.
    • 01:00:47
      Do you have
    • 01:00:49
      your Street View, you can pull that up.
    • 01:01:00
      A couple things coming that I'm not sure what to do with.
    • 01:01:05
      One of them is over on University Circle, there's a terrazzo floor on the outside going into the entrance.
    • 01:01:14
      And it's also then continued on the inside.
    • 01:01:16
      And then there's a tile mosaic around the edge of that.
    • 01:01:22
      They've had some structural issues.
    • 01:01:24
      I think they're going to remove the slab.
    • 01:01:27
      So it's like, well, do we?
    • 01:01:31
      Did we replace it?
    • 01:01:34
      I think I may have sent you all a note about what do we, and I didn't realize when I sent that it is actually terrazzo, so it's not like somebody did an inlay into the concrete.
    • 01:01:47
      It was put there and then they grinded down.
    • 01:01:50
      So I'll need to look at how, I mean that's one of those that's, it is a nice feature, but you say, well do you have to,
    • 01:02:01
      replace something if it's removed.
    • 01:02:02
      I'm going to do a little more homework on that.
    • 01:02:06
      The other one that I'm getting is, yeah, to drive my car.
    • Carl SchwarzPlanning Commission Representative, Board of Architectural Review
    • 01:02:11
      Do they have to replace it because they're going to, like there's other portions of the building they want to repair that it's in the way?
    • 01:02:19
      Like are they waterproofing under it?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:02:21
      I think they're not certain to what they're going to find.
    • Carl SchwarzPlanning Commission Representative, Board of Architectural Review
    • 01:02:27
      So I'm just kind of wondering if they can just
    • 01:02:30
      Isn't there a way that you can insert like expanding foam under concrete and make it kind of pop back up?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:02:35
      Well, I'm not sold on that because that assumes that, oh look there's a truck there of course.
    • 01:02:46
      Actually that may not be it.
    • 01:02:49
      But that assumes that you've solved whatever problem you're dealing with.
    • 01:02:54
      So that's why I'm, because I was asked about that on a sorority house over on
    • 01:03:00
      The other side of rugby.
    • 01:03:02
      And I said, well, yeah, they can jack it up.
    • 01:03:04
      But something's going on underneath that caused this to lose, you know, whatever, the stability.
    • 01:03:11
      So figure that out before, you know.
    • 01:03:15
      So yeah, this is that.
    • 01:03:17
      This is the porch right here.
    • 01:03:20
      And it's got this band going around it.
    • 01:03:22
      So I think they're trying to figure out, what are we dealing with here?
    • 01:03:25
      But I'm going to have to do some homework on
    • 01:03:29
      At what point does it tip the scale, replace in kind?
    • 01:03:36
      But the other one that I am going to be asking you all about is, and then we're going to talk about conservation districts.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:03:47
      So this will be on the docket next month?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:03:50
      I don't know yet.
    • 01:03:52
      I need to do a little more homework.
    • 01:03:58
      I'm just sharing with you.
    • 01:03:59
      That's the background of my question that I had asked you all.
    • 01:04:02
      So, interesting situation here.
    • 01:04:06
      We have the church at Ridge in West Main.
    • 01:04:11
      The congregation has been renovating it, doing things.
    • 01:04:18
      They're found out in the 50s.
    • 01:04:20
      There used to be a stained glass window in this opening here.
    • 01:04:26
      It was broken and it was plastered over.
    • 01:04:28
      It's even in the historic survey.
    • 01:04:33
      I don't want to share anything.
    • 01:04:34
      Maybe you point it out.
    • 01:04:36
      There was something you found in the survey.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:04:38
      Yeah, it was a window.
    • 01:04:42
      Somebody broke it in the 1950s and this was a black church in the 1950s and we can only deduce a white church would have probably installed another stained glass window
    • 01:04:55
      a black church not wanting the window to be broken again would have put this wood insert in it.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:05:01
      It's sad.
    • 01:05:02
      Yeah, it's a threat I'd love to, I want to even tug at and see if we can find out more about it.
    • 01:05:05
      So the congregation that would be going in here has not asked to put in a new stained glass window because on the inside the wall's been covered up.
    • 01:05:19
      So it would be installing stained glass
    • 01:05:24
      but backlit and so there's the but it's it's a church that this would be a sign for the church so it has to meet the sign regs but I'm sort of stuck on even if it did is it
    • 01:05:46
      Is it appropriate to change this opening?
    • 01:05:51
      And I said, I'm not sure where to come down on this yet.
    • 01:05:55
      And I'm not sure how to even phrase it to you all.
    • 01:05:59
      But this is one of the types of questions that we get of how to treat this.
    • 01:06:06
      And I'm leaning towards they can do something if it meets the sign regs, and that we know
    • 01:06:22
      You know, this trim, this piece that was there gets replaced.
    • 01:06:26
      I'm leaning in that direction, but I need to do somewhere else.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 01:06:31
      It seems like a reasonable direction.
    • 01:06:33
      Yeah.
    • 01:06:34
      Frankly, why not put a stained glass back lid in there?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:06:38
      And so, now there is another project around the corner where someone wants to do some artistic stained glass panels.
    • 01:06:50
      and I've responded that well that you're introducing something that wasn't there and backlighting and creating you know it's not artwork now you're you're suggesting windows where there were not windows so.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:07:02
      Is there any discussion of why not just turn it back into a window?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:07:08
      I don't know what's going on on the inside.
    • 01:07:12
      I mean it very well been a high ceiling that's now a floor up there.
    • 01:07:16
      I don't know what the circumstances are inside.
    • 01:07:22
      My guess is they want this to be an illuminated sign.
    • 01:07:28
      Most stained glass windows are experienced from the inside, not the outside.
    • Carl SchwarzPlanning Commission Representative, Board of Architectural Review
    • 01:07:32
      You keep saying it has to adhere to the sign ordinance.
    • 01:07:38
      Maybe this is covered by that, but are you allowed to do an illuminated sign?
    • 01:07:44
      That's basically what this is.
    • 01:07:47
      It's just glass instead of plastic.
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 01:07:49
      Well, we don't know yet because we don't have the specs yet.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:07:53
      Yeah, I know what exactly, but you're right.
    • 01:07:55
      Is it internally lit sign?
    • 01:07:57
      How is it?
    • 01:07:57
      I don't have that answer.
    • Carl SchwarzPlanning Commission Representative, Board of Architectural Review
    • 01:08:01
      That is allowed by the zoning code now because I guess I don't know what our signage regs say anymore.
    • 01:08:09
      I don't know how I feel about an illuminated sign.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:08:14
      Did they say illuminated?
    • Carl SchwarzPlanning Commission Representative, Board of Architectural Review
    • 01:08:15
      I made the joke about it looking like Publix, but it does kind of
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:08:20
      Well, my concern would be that it would be obviously over-illuminate.
    • 01:08:24
      You do appreciate the stained glass from the inside, but there is something about driving by church at night and then seeing the glow through the stained glass.
    • 01:08:36
      And it would be a little incongruous if the backlight was really loud and bright.
    • 01:08:47
      It could be a detriment, I think,
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:08:51
      Yeah, so I have to struggle with it.
    • SPEAKER_00
    • 01:08:54
      It looks like to the left of the image, if you go down, scroll down, you have to sort of pan.
    • 01:09:01
      There's like a sign board there on the corner.
    • 01:09:07
      Are they planning to use that as a sign?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:09:09
      So that's where the question becomes, how many signs, and what's the cumulative area, et cetera, et cetera.
    • 01:09:18
      So one of the things.
    • 01:09:21
      Reed Brodhead, the zoning administrator, had an intern spend some time the last couple of weeks taking the new sign ordinance and breaking it down and going to our guidelines and saying, all right, where are the, where are we, where do we have conflicts?
    • 01:09:39
      And the old sign ordinance used to
    • 01:09:43
      almost specifically referred to the guidelines.
    • 01:09:45
      In fact, there were places where the design guidelines were part of the ordinance.
    • 01:09:49
      That's been stripped out.
    • 01:09:50
      So sort of like the situation we had with the coffee place.
    • 01:09:57
      So we're going to identify where there are some potential conflicts and we're going to have to solve that.
    • 01:10:04
      But yeah, I mean, it would be if they proposed signage here
    • 01:10:09
      It would be saying, you know, what is your total signage?
    • 01:10:13
      Is that under what you're really receiving?
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 01:10:16
      I have a possible wrinkle here.
    • 01:10:19
      There's something called the Freedom of Religion Act.
    • 01:10:21
      I checked on that, yes.
    • 01:10:22
      And it may not allow you to tell them what they can put up for signs.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:10:27
      My understanding is that's... I don't know.
    • 01:10:30
      I checked on that, and I got an answer, so that wasn't...
    • 01:10:36
      and it got technical so I can't repeat enough to be correct, but I was told that's not an issue here.
    • 01:10:44
      But I appreciate you asking that.
    • 01:10:46
      So wait and see.
    • 01:10:49
      It's always something interesting going on.
    • 01:10:54
      Anything else on that list that popped in your head?
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 01:11:03
      The surf board things.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:11:09
      I did Carl's comment about the public's.
    • 01:11:12
      It was kind of funny knowing.
    • 01:11:14
      That's the infamous portal.
    • 01:11:16
      You also sent an email about some doors on the downtown mall.
    • 01:11:29
      entryways over... Yeah, we solved that one, somewhat.
    • 01:11:34
      Well, if you go into revolutionary soup and it's a 48-inch opening, so two 24-inch door leaves and someone
    • 01:11:53
      The owner said that they've asked the BAR, and the BAR has refused to allow them to
    • 01:12:10
      I thought it was really interesting to see, I can't remember what the number was that I said for total approvals, but then, you know, something like 80 denials.
    • 01:12:34
      I just wanted to share that with you all because it is that I know you may also hear it but Kate was so she thought it was such a great note she said I'm framing this and putting it up in my office so if you guys you know anybody has a coupon at Michael's share with Kate so what I wanted to
    • 01:12:57
      Kate has actually moved her office across the hall and I keep forgetting she's now a few doors down for me so I'll walk over to the other side and we have to go through our get smart doors to get there.
    • 01:13:12
      We'll fight each other.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:13:28
      So give me 15 minutes to just, A, and some instruction here that, and I think Kate and Jerry, maybe this will be new and helpful to you.
    • 01:13:43
      Roger, I don't know if we've had this conversation.
    • 01:13:45
      Carl will say.
    • 01:13:46
      you'll fall asleep because this is old stuff, but it's all part of your training.
    • 01:13:51
      And so I briefly wanted to talk about the city's historic conservation districts and why and what your purview is and why.
    • 01:14:00
      And let's set my thing for 15 minutes.
    • 01:14:09
      So we have, and it's not really,
    • 01:14:14
      maybe this was a better screen, so we've got within the city of Charlottesville we have eight EDC districts architectural design control districts established by city code and those are the green if you look on the GIS map we have we have also three historic conservation districts that were established in the city, Woulin Mills Village, Martha Jefferson Main Road, and Rokey Road
    • 01:14:43
      and it really came out of, this happened, I know Jane Fisher as well as I know had this idea in 2008, 2009 when Martha Jack was leaving and you were seeing some of that encroachment and changeover of the buildings so the neighborhood wasn't enthused about an ADC district so Mary Joy explored, sorry I'm not speaking
    • 01:15:11
      Mary Joy explored something that, more of a historic district light, and these are the conservation districts.
    • 01:15:21
      It was followed by folks at Rugby Road, wanted one there, and then Willow Mills Village in 2017, although there was a little more attention over that one, but eventually it was approved.
    • 01:15:36
      And so, next slide.
    • 01:15:39
      And then the third thing we have in the city, and we've lost some and added some, I think it's 77, individually protected properties.
    • 01:15:52
      And as I tell people, my house here is not within a district, and so by and large these are older properties, older structures that didn't fall within
    • 01:16:08
      the boundaries of one of the ADC districts.
    • 01:16:11
      And then go to the next slide.
    • 01:16:13
      But you do see that in some cases, like over here, like Windhurst was an IPP.
    • 01:16:22
      So some of these are IPPs, but then are within ADC districts.
    • 01:16:27
      It doesn't change anything.
    • 01:16:28
      It doesn't mean it's a double protection.
    • 01:16:33
      it has two designations and one of those being is if we could go and remove the IPP designation but if let's say the city decided to do away with the ADC districts so at least there's two levels of protection on it now we have several addresses that are IPPs within conservation districts
    • 01:17:00
      those are treated at the more rigid level.
    • 01:17:02
      So if it's an IPP within a conservation district, then it's reviewed under the ADC district guidelines.
    • 01:17:10
      Next slide.
    • 01:17:12
      I get this question a lot, even internally.
    • 01:17:18
      Somebody's doing something in North Belmont that they bring it to you.
    • 01:17:22
      That's fine.
    • 01:17:24
      North Belmont, the Fry Spring, and Fifeville-Tonsler
    • 01:17:29
      those are historic districts on a national register.
    • 01:17:33
      They do not have a local district corollary.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:17:36
      Now, Martha Jeff does the, I really love the name, downtown is the Charlottesville Albemarle Courthouse Historic District.
    • 01:17:46
      Workman is on a national register, West Main, Wolden Mills, although it's much larger.
    • 01:17:53
      And by and large, these national register districts
    • 01:17:58
      aligned with our local districts, but not perfectly.
    • 01:18:01
      But these, in and of itself, something being on the National Register does not mean we have purview.
    • 01:18:09
      It just happens to be our global designation overlap.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:18:13
      So next slide.
    • 01:18:16
      And same thing with, we have several individually listed sites on the National Register.
    • 01:18:26
      unless one of those falls within the local district designation, we do not have purview over it.
    • 01:18:33
      And I know I've used this example, I used it this morning.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:18:37
      Monticello out here is on a UNESCO site, every listing you could imagine.
    • 01:18:45
      However, Albemarle County does not have a Historic Preservation Ordinance.
    • 01:18:50
      So the Thomas Jefferson Foundation wanted to raise Monticello
    • 01:18:55
      Not saying they would.
    • 01:18:57
      But the county has no legal means to deny that demolition permit.
    • 01:19:02
      There's no local ordinance that they could say, no, we can't allow you a demolition permit.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:19:08
      You can't blow it up in a time of war based on UNESCO designation.
    • 01:19:14
      But it really is that local designation in the state of Virginia which
    • 01:19:20
      allows us to have some say over alterations and demolitions.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 01:19:40
      So every property that's on the Virginia National Register is an IPP though, right?
    • 01:19:46
      No, no.
    • 01:19:47
      IPP is just local, is that right?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:19:49
      So that's where, and every, go back a slide, and every national register district are not
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:20:02
      So why is North Belmont, Frye Springs, and Fife Hill national and everything else local?
    • 01:20:07
      Is it because everything else was local and then they wanted to fill in the gaps and so they made tax credits, right?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:20:16
      No, well it's anecdotal but my understanding is particularly North Belmont they said you're not, we don't want to be in a district.
    • 01:20:27
      We don't want to go to the B.A.R.
    • 01:20:28
      but
    • 01:20:29
      and then the explanation of being on the National Register doesn't cause any of that.
    • 01:20:33
      Oh, okay.
    • 01:20:34
      So, I think similar with Whiteville.
    • 01:20:37
      But it was that very real concern that there would be a people didn't want to be subject to PAR review.
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 01:20:51
      Did these other things, the Martha Jefferson neighborhood, Rugby Road, and Woollen Mills, they specifically asked to become conservation districts?
    • 01:21:03
      Yes.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:21:04
      They were all organic from the neighborhoods.
    • 01:21:07
      And in fact, I mean, Carl would be able to say, but I think Fife, Phil, and Tonsler was a hard no.
    • 01:21:13
      They absolutely said no.
    • 01:21:15
      They don't want to do that.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:21:18
      And so I wish I had included the map.
    • 01:21:21
      When I came on board 2018, Mary Jo had sort of a list of where they needed surveys done.
    • 01:21:29
      And the Little High neighborhood, which we completed, the Rose Hill district we completed, Star Hill was completed.
    • Carl SchwarzPlanning Commission Representative, Board of Architectural Review
    • 01:21:42
      Tethic Page.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:21:44
      And Tethic Page, which was in, it was,
    • 01:21:48
      about 450 properties.
    • 01:21:50
      It was a very expensive survey, but all of those were found eligible.
    • 01:21:56
      So when we do a survey, the consultants will go through, do the, it's more of a windshield survey.
    • 01:22:05
      It's not the deep dive.
    • 01:22:07
      When you go to put something on the National Register, that's a much deeper dive.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:22:12
      So we did the initial surveys for those neighborhoods
    • 01:22:18
      then the consultants will confer with the Department of Historic Resources on whether it's eligible or not and then it has to go like for example all these like Rose Hill and 10th and Page and Little High.
    • 01:22:34
      We make a recommendation then to the state review boards, well DHR is the state review board and Jody used to serve on that.
    • 01:22:43
      They make an official determination whether or not
    • 01:22:48
      the district would be eligible for the National Register.
    • 01:22:51
      So that's a, it doesn't, it means now you can go back and if you wish to submit a nomination for the National Register, we'll accept it.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:23:02
      But it gets to where, if you're going to do that, you need to, DHR used to say you need to have a majority, it's now a significant majority of folks have to subvert that.
    • 01:23:17
      and in fact even to the point where doing a survey is, they're very wary of pushback and we dealt with that at 10 page.
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 01:23:25
      And why do the homeowners want it or not want it?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:23:29
      So there are different reasons and I'll set that here for now.
    • 01:23:35
      So we've completed a survey of I think all of the historical or historic neighborhoods in the city.
    • 01:23:46
      DHR is actually very interested in Greenbrier, which has a really interesting 1950s and 60s environment to it that they'd like to consider, but I don't know if that's possible.
    • 01:23:59
      Where Roger lives, I know you're not part of the, is that in the Ridespring district?
    • 01:24:05
      You're a street.
    • 01:24:06
      I'm not sure.
    • 01:24:07
      Yeah, I don't street that.
    • 01:24:08
      So there's these really interesting old subdivisions around town that are unique.
    • 01:24:14
      I've had
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:24:16
      One of the things Mary Joy had said, we'd always like to do South Belmont, but that's 1,100 properties.
    • 01:24:24
      And it's about $125 a property to budget a survey, so I don't see myself having $100,000 to do a survey of that neighborhood.
    • 01:24:36
      So we've done them, and then they're now eligible, but just like with
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:24:42
      A little high neighborhood, I said to the neighbors, you know, I will support you.
    • 01:24:46
      I can provide some funds towards a National Register nomination, but you've got to bring it to me.
    • 01:24:53
      I'm not going to go in the neighborhood and knock on doors.
    • 01:24:57
      And so it really, we want those neighborhoods to take ownership of it.
    • 01:25:02
      And that's what did occur with, let me put it back now, that's what did occur with the three conservation districts.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:25:10
      So the last thing, you go back to this one.
    • 01:25:12
      So the last piece going down.
    • 01:25:16
      The other piece of the puzzle that the three-legged chair that Kate and I sit on at the city, this one with you all.
    • 01:25:27
      And then we also do design review in the entrance corridors.
    • 01:25:30
      I don't know how many of you do that.
    • 01:25:33
      And the design review in those places is done by the Planning Commission.
    • 01:25:38
      has what's called the entrance corridor review board, although the acronym is BRB.
    • 01:25:42
      I don't know why the C is not in there, but it goes on at the top.
    • 01:25:47
      I have a lot more freedom to review things in entrance corridors administratively.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:25:54
      So the next thing, so going back to the three historic conservation districts, Rugby Road, Marda Jeff, Willard Mills,
    • 01:26:09
      One of the big differences, I used myself today by being creative, so the ADC district guidelines are about 120, 150 pages high.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:26:20
      But they're not that old.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:26:27
      Little drama.
    • 01:26:29
      And the conservation district guidelines are, I think, three or four pages high.
    • 01:26:36
      That's one of the big distinctions between the two is that things are very short, limited.
    • 01:26:44
      Sometimes that's a great thing.
    • 01:26:47
      Sometimes it leaves things a little open-ended.
    • 01:26:51
      But, so we've got here Martha Jefferson, I'll look up there.
    • 01:26:56
      Martha Jefferson is part of the Conservation District established in 2010.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:27:00
      It's 58 acres, 155 properties, including Maplewood Cemetery.
    • 01:27:06
      which is interesting because I've never, I guess I could say if you are burying someone and putting the headstone, they should come to us for approval but I've never been asked that so I'm dodging it but the period of significance for that district is the late 1800s and to the mid-20th century.
    • 01:27:29
      It's a range of architectural styles in there.
    • 01:27:34
      spent some time a couple weeks ago with folks from Fredericksburg interested in conservation districts and when you get out into these places and sort of I mean we look at the piecemeal but when you get out and walk around look at them you do see it really is an interesting there's a cohesiveness to this district that that that works I you know when you get further north things start to spread out a little bit but you know down near the hospital it really is interesting how how well in all ties together
    • 01:28:04
      The next one, and then within each conservation district, this is a distinction between the ADC districts.
    • 01:28:16
      There's a set of character-defining features which these neighborhoods have produced.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:28:23
      So this is what came out of discussions with the folks in the Martha Jaffa neighborhood.
    • 01:28:27
      They said these are the things we think are important.
    • 01:28:31
      Next one is
    • 01:28:34
      Roadby Road District, 25 acres, 30 contributing structures, period significance roughly the same as Martha Jeff, although the architectural style's a little more, not as vernacular as you see in other places.
    • 01:28:52
      But what I think's really interesting about this district, and it's reflected in, you go to the next page, but it's these, you have these
    • 01:29:02
      set back, deep set planted front yard.
    • 01:29:05
      So there's this rhythm, let me go back to the picture, that this is really what you all are charged with preserving and protecting.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:29:16
      This is one of those areas, oh that's me, this is one of those areas where we'll have to see how the ordinance works out because the ordinance very much wants things coming out to the road and that's in conflict with these guidelines.
    • 01:29:32
      The third district we have is, of course, Woolen Mills Village Historic Conservation District.
    • 01:29:39
      That's the last one established.
    • 01:29:43
      56 acres, 67 contributing properties, including Riverside Cemetery.
    • 01:29:51
      I don't know really how to describe this district because the mill town itself is actually down here in the county.
    • 01:29:59
      So this is an actual registered district.
    • 01:30:01
      but it straddles the city county line.
    • 01:30:05
      Eclectic is the best word I can think of for the Willam Mills district.
    • 01:30:19
      We don't get much out of this district so we haven't had to
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:30:24
      to think about it.
    • 01:30:25
      But this is where you get the two or three pages of guidelines.
    • 01:30:29
      But this is what we really, when we get a conservation district, need to be taking in mind.
    • 01:30:33
      This is what the neighborhood would want.
    • 01:30:35
      This isn't, like our other guidelines, this isn't from council.
    • 01:30:38
      This is from those neighborhoods.
    • 01:30:41
      So next slide.
    • 01:30:44
      So what's interesting is we've had, granted they've only been
    • 01:30:52
      established for a couple of years but really don't see a lot in these districts and a lot of what we see I can look at administratively.
    • 01:31:04
      Primarily in a conservation district I will bring to you, well I have to bring to you demolitions and demolitions of primary, they, it doesn't, it's not clear but I
    • 01:31:18
      When someone wants to do something to a shed, I treat that separately from the house, the primary building or structure.
    • 01:31:27
      Or if someone wants to construct a shed, I don't treat that as a new building.
    • 01:31:34
      And the objective of the Conservation District was primarily to have a means to tap the brakes for demolitions and
    • 01:31:44
      to have at least some level of review for new construction.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:31:50
      But by and large, we don't review something in a conservation district if you can't see it from the street.
    • 01:31:56
      And I think there's some elements of conservation districts that would be worth considering for the ABC district.
    • 01:32:04
      I think there's some streamlining of these reviews that I think would be beneficial.
    • 01:32:09
      I think people would be supportive of it.
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 01:32:12
      And there is a new construction coming for Martha Jeff, right?
    • 01:32:14
      That's the plot.
    • 01:32:15
      They split their lot.
    • 01:32:16
      They're going to build.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:32:17
      Yes, yes.
    • 01:32:18
      We have something coming.
    • 01:32:21
      But this is one where the guidelines, because the Martha Jeff, they were very involved.
    • 01:32:27
      We have some good instruction.
    • 01:32:28
      You also have seen that large project that was proposed at the old Martha Jefferson Hospital site.
    • 01:32:34
      So the scales coming through.
    • 01:32:38
      a little bit of flexibility.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:32:40
      I think something might be coming back, Carl can over projects.
    • 01:32:43
      We will see how that goes.
    • SPEAKER_06
    • 01:32:46
      Can you go back to the last slide, please?
    • 01:32:48
      So under required update, is that something that we need to do?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:32:53
      Yes.
    • 01:32:54
      And so that's why I'm sort of teeing this up.
    • 01:32:59
      The code, in fact, the old code, very specifically, because there was so much concern about
    • 01:33:10
      Council is very careful in the Conservation Districts.
    • 01:33:13
      And so they told, in 15 years, we get to check it again and update it and update the guidelines and also revisit the list of contributing structures.
    • 01:33:30
      Now, some of that was meant to be, well, something was built in 1970 and didn't get included maybe this time around.
    • 01:33:39
      Do they have community organizations that are set up now?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:34:08
      I have a north downtown group.
    • 01:34:12
      I have no idea who they are.
    • 01:34:13
      I don't know when they last met.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:34:15
      So you can use them as the initial contact, but you really still have to reach out to everybody.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:34:24
      NDRA is still active.
    • 01:34:29
      I get notices.
    • 01:34:31
      I mean, you're in that neighborhood.
    • 01:34:36
      I'm not saying that they have meetings monthly, but there's certain leaders that are still, that you could send something to.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:34:46
      That's where it gets to.
    • 01:34:47
      There are individuals in the neighborhood who, like we had the situation with 10th and Page.
    • 01:34:56
      It was like, yes, there were certain folks that were involved, but that didn't get us
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:35:02
      to everyone to communicate.
    • 01:35:03
      So it's just something to be, we're going to have to be very diligent with it.
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 01:35:10
      We do have the software we've purchased that the Parks Master Plan was done to engage the public and we have access to that now so that could be a method for... Were the neighborhoods engaged during the development code process?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:35:25
      Because the last time we redid the code it was all about engaging the neighborhoods
    • 01:35:31
      and having neighborhood-specific meetings in 2003 and 2005.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:35:36
      The comp plan, when I came on, that first year, I think it was six different meetings.
    • 01:35:43
      Right.
    • 01:35:44
      Yeah.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:35:45
      The second round with the comp plan, I was a consultant, handled a lot of that, and staff was someone's staff.
    • 01:35:52
      I don't remember any of them.
    • Carl SchwarzPlanning Commission Representative, Board of Architectural Review
    • 01:35:54
      It was a door outreach for the zoning code, I'm pretty sure.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:35:58
      There's no perfect way.
    • 01:36:01
      Your role in this is that whatever the recommendation is to council, and I think it's not, if you go back, Kate, to the defining features for, so I think that these, I would say to the folks in the neighborhoods, you want to change these, what do you think, have these been working, where I see
    • 01:36:29
      Your contribution is that the three-page guidelines and saying, has this been a valid tool or could it be tweaked?
    • 01:36:44
      And I think there's ways it could be.
    • Carl SchwarzPlanning Commission Representative, Board of Architectural Review
    • 01:36:46
      But also, I think we have to be careful with the guidelines if we change them, that we change them for all three districts.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:36:51
      That's right.
    • 01:36:52
      And so the general guidelines, the three pages apply to all three districts.
    • 01:36:59
      So do I end up, yeah, which is the cart, which is the horse, and we're trying to figure that out.
    • 01:37:10
      But some have said we'll just simply advertise that you're reviewing it and take what comments you get.
    • 01:37:17
      I don't, I want to be straightforward with that, but you hopefully will figure that out.
    • 01:37:29
      those are your three historic conservation districts and your responsibilities within them.
    • 01:37:38
      I did, like I said on that last slide, you saw we don't get a lot.
    • 01:37:42
      I actually predicted, I thought Martha Check would be the place we'd be seeing a lot happening.
    • 01:37:49
      It certainly is where we see the most, but a lot of people do dining properties over there and not
    • 01:37:57
      seeking to alter them.
    • 01:37:59
      So it's been a good thing.
    • 01:38:06
      And if you have any questions, that's your 15 minute training on conservation history.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:38:10
      I have a question.
    • 01:38:10
      Did I hear you correctly that a survey would be 100,000 for a neighborhood?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:38:16
      So to do, sorry.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:38:18
      Just to do the Belmont.
    • 01:38:19
      The South Belmont.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:38:20
      South Belmont's 1,100 properties.
    • 01:38:22
      And if you figure 100 to 120,
    • 01:38:25
      That's the rough budget to do a survey for property.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:38:30
      And that would be huge.
    • 01:38:33
      What do they do with it?
    • 01:38:33
      What's the action?
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:38:34
      Well, and Mills was done by a graduate student.
    • 01:38:37
      And there was some professional review after that.
    • 01:38:42
      And it was paid for by a small group of people.
    • 01:38:44
      And I don't think they paid $100,000.
    • 01:38:45
      It was neighbors within the district.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:38:50
      And that's that distinction of if the neighborhood wants to do it and coordinate, that's one thing.
    • 01:38:58
      For me to go in and say the city of Charlottesville wants to complete a historic survey of this neighborhood, I would have to follow the parameters.
    • 01:39:10
      What are the parameters?
    • 01:39:13
      So when you're doing a, things have changed as far as what DHR, and I think sometimes some of this is that where surveys have occurred or they've allowed a district and folks that will, you know, I didn't vote or things like that.
    • 01:39:31
      So to the city's policy, and I think this came out of the, out of the Bullen Mills
    • 01:39:41
      The tension that was associated with that is that if somebody wants to do a historic district before we even do a, we need to do a survey.
    • 01:39:55
      So it had been, like Rugby Road is not a National Register District and the survey was, although I think
    • 01:40:06
      I think Jen Halleck helped out with that one, but the neighbors had done it.
    • 01:40:10
      So you had the qualifications, and they did it.
    • 01:40:13
      But to just simply as a sort of rule of thumb, if I, the city preservation guy, went in and said, we're going to survey South Milan, I would have to budget that as $100,000, given the, you know,
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:40:30
      What does the survey entail?
    • 01:40:32
      Is it a house survey and a land survey?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:40:35
      No, it is a, in fact, the direction things have gone in the past, if you read a national
    • 01:40:47
      and I was kind of laughing because only an attorney can read those things and not falsely.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:40:51
      Oh no, I'm queued up on the city's website right now looking at all of them for AGC districts.
    • 01:40:57
      So they're really... Or actually all the districts.
    • 01:40:59
      So I could email any of these to any of you.
    • 01:41:03
      Staff has access to them.
    • 01:41:05
      They're basically like a page for each property.
    • 01:41:09
      I'm not saying it's easy.
    • 01:41:11
      But it's actually what I sent to everybody on the Ridge Street church.
    • 01:41:17
      It's that one page summary that's done.
    • 01:41:20
      I don't know how much work goes into it and I don't know what it costs.
    • 01:41:23
      But I know some of these have been done in the past.
    • 01:41:28
      by graduate students, you know, architectural historian, graduate students at UVA in architecture.
    • 01:41:36
      So that cost is just crazy.
    • Carl SchwarzPlanning Commission Representative, Board of Architectural Review
    • 01:41:39
      What is the woolen mill survey?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:41:43
      To answer David's question, the thing is that it's a very
    • 01:41:48
      The language is really dry, and it's things like this two story, three bay, American bond brick, double bonded, and you're like, I don't know what I, it's almost entirely architecture.
    • 01:42:05
      There's.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:42:07
      Well there's history on it.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:42:08
      There's a narrative.
    • 01:42:09
      A narrative.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:42:10
      I just sent one today to someone, 213 Seventh Street, it's I think the oldest
    • 01:42:15
      property in the city.
    • 01:42:17
      And I used to run a business there and somebody thought I knew something about it.
    • 01:42:21
      I'm like, I don't know anything, but here's the, but it, you know, it was historical.
    • 01:42:25
      It was Charles Everett.
    • 01:42:26
      He was, anyway, told a lot about the owner, 213 7th, the little white house, the Everett house.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:42:33
      And it was built by John Coles.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:42:42
      No, that's not the same one.
    • 01:42:43
      This one was built by Charles Everett, and it was down in Milton, and it was moved here, and it was in place by 1849.
    • 01:42:50
      I need to look.
    • 01:42:53
      I can send it to you.
    • 01:42:54
      I just sent it to somebody today.
    • 01:42:56
      But to Carl's question, yeah.
    • 01:42:59
      But to Carl's question, the survey's not on our city website.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:43:04
      So one of the things we've got to work on.
    • 01:43:06
      There's a lot of stuff that's on there.
    • 01:43:07
      There's a lot of stuff that's not.
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 01:43:10
      So one, I just offer the South Belmont as an example of if we did a survey, it wouldn't be inexpensive.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:43:32
      is that a lot of our, and can you do this in our next learning circle, we have a lot of historic districts, not a lot, we have several historic districts that were surveyed in the 80s.
    • 01:43:48
      So we have outdated Workland Street, Ridge Street, some of these need to be updated and need to be updated.
    • 01:43:58
      Cheri's right, we probably could find some volunteers that could update them, but there's, you know, that takes a lot of work and coordination, but that's one means to an end.
    • 01:44:12
      So I'm really looking at some point in time, I need to turn back and look at these older surveys that we've done, update them, bring things in, rather than
    • 01:44:29
      trying to find additional neighborhoods.
    • 01:44:32
      That's sort of where some of the tension is now.
    • 01:44:37
      For example, there's a corner up here at High Street.
    • 01:44:41
      There's a couple blocks in that are not, you go east of the courthouse and north of Jefferson Street.
    • 01:44:47
      That corner's not designated and some really neat houses in there.
    • 01:44:51
      So we have places that we could look.
    • 01:44:56
      Carl, you had asked me about
    • 01:44:59
      Now I can't remember your question.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:45:02
      Ron had a comment.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 01:45:04
      No, my particular comment is I actually would think the city doesn't need to go around finding places to list.
    • 01:45:09
      I think if the neighborhoods want to be listed, they should come to the city and do it that way.
    • 01:45:14
      I think it would be completely silly for us to go out and try to make more historic districts just because we would like to do that.
    • 01:45:21
      That's my personal opinion.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:45:22
      Yeah, that's never happened.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 01:45:23
      Okay, well that's what I'm saying.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:45:26
      That's been a city policy and so I get asked that very often, you know, why isn't 10th and Page a historic district?
    • 01:45:34
      Why isn't Star Hill?
    • 01:45:35
      Why isn't Rose Hill?
    • 01:45:38
      And I've said, we've surveyed, we've completed, the city's done its due diligence, if you will, but the question then becomes,
    • 01:45:49
      If those, I mean like Rose Hill, I met with the neighborhood, it wasn't a large group, but they were at them.
    • 01:45:58
      We don't want anything.
    • 01:46:00
      I found Burleigh High School and that's what led to getting Burleigh on the National Register.
    • 01:46:04
      So you do get results out of these things.
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 01:46:07
      Can they undo it?
    • 01:46:09
      In what way?
    • 01:46:10
      Could the neighborhood come at Woollen Mills and say that we don't want to be a historical... So being on the National Register or not
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:46:21
      It's almost like it doesn't really matter.
    • 01:46:24
      I mean, unless now, and I'd be careful saying that, being on the National Register, yes, a property is eligible for rehabilitation tax credits, which have tremendous benefit.
    • 01:46:37
      It also protects, you know,
    • 01:46:40
      from, if someone wanted to build a highway through the city of Charlottesville, they would have to, if there are state and federal dollars involved, they'd have to have a pretty darn good reason for bulldozing a historic neighborhood.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 01:46:53
      But could a historic district decide to dissolve itself?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:46:57
      So from a, at the national register.
    • SPEAKER_07
    • 01:46:59
      No, I'm not worried about the national register, I'm talking about the city.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:47:02
      Right, and I'll answer both.
    • 01:47:03
      I don't know, I think that a community could, and also.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:47:07
      It's the same, it's a,
    • 01:47:10
      It's a city code.
    • 01:47:12
      It's just like 104 Stadium Road.
    • 01:47:15
      It's like undoing an individually protected property, which we've had one recently, 104 Stadium.
    • 01:47:20
      And they were heading with demolishing it.
    • 01:47:24
      Well, we didn't, but council did.
    • 01:47:27
      But it's just a change in the city code.
    • 01:47:30
      But it usually would come before us.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:47:32
      As a recommendation, right.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:47:33
      As a recommendation to council.
    • 01:47:35
      So any addition or deletion.
    • 01:47:37
      And it's legislation for them, they would be amending their city code.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:47:42
      It's called a zoning tax amendment, zoning map amendment.
    • 01:47:49
      They're embedded, they're enshrined in our ordinance.
    • 01:47:52
      They would have to change the text and then they would have to change the map that reflects.
    • SPEAKER_01
    • 01:47:57
      So for inside these historical districts it is legally mandated if you wanted to demolish a building you had to come to the floor and then
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:48:11
      For a local designated historic property, yes.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:48:18
      That power comes from the Code of Virginia.
    • 01:48:22
      If it's a contributing power.
    • 01:48:23
      Localities are given the ability to designate historic resources and protect them in these very limited ways.
    • 01:48:31
      And the most extreme way we can is by
    • 01:48:34
      deciding whether something goes away or not with demolition.
    • 01:48:37
      And the rest is a little bit soft as far as what our design guidelines are and how we legislate those districts.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:48:47
      The national registrar, though, you'd be- No such thing.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:48:51
      They take your plaque away.
    • 01:48:53
      And so that's where sort of to what Jerry was asking also is, so Workland Street right now, we're seeing arguably the diminution of its.
    • 01:49:02
      Carrick.
    • 01:49:04
      It's very possible that, I don't think DHR is proactive necessarily about it, but if there were an inquiry, they would, and I'd have to ask them, when we have demolitions of a certain scale, I usually say, what do you guys think?
    • 01:49:21
      I think that's probably one national registered district that's precariously perched.
    • 01:49:25
      They could delist it or compress it.
    • 01:49:28
      But that wouldn't change what we do.
    • 01:49:31
      The city council gets to determine any designation.
    • 01:49:36
      They get the final say.
    • 01:49:37
      And that's why any action that you all take is appealable to city council.
    • 01:49:42
      They're the legislative body.
    • 01:49:44
      And to sort of continue what Cheri was saying about the demolitions,
    • 01:49:50
      you all didn't, in 144 Chancellor, you did not tell them they can't knock it down.
    • 01:49:57
      What you determined was based on the criteria in your guidelines you do not, demolition would be, would conflict with those guidelines so that it would be inappropriate to allow that demolition.
    • 01:50:14
      That was what you all decided and so
    • 01:50:21
      I said that the BAR, this is what the BAR determined.
    • 01:50:25
      And then in preparing the summary for council, what I made clear was this is what Mr. Blair, and I talk a lot, this is what they stated, and this is what the BAR's response to those things were.
    • 01:50:40
      So I've laid that out.
    • 01:50:43
      Council could very well
    • 01:50:46
      They could.
    • 01:50:48
      So they're being asked not to overturn or uphold the BAR.
    • 01:50:52
      The council gets asked to approve or deny a COA.
    • 01:50:55
      They're asked the same question you were asked.
    • 01:50:57
      So that's why I make the comment about it's not rebuking the BAR.
    • 01:51:02
      But if the city council says no, you can't knock it down, they can then appeal.
    • 01:51:11
      You know, so they have that next step available to them.
    • 01:51:14
      There's another provision in our code which allows someone to make the property available at market rate and if someone offers to buy it and preserve, rehab the building.
    • 01:51:30
      The thing is that property is, it's one large property and this school house is one of two structures and so I'm like, well I don't know exactly how that would apply.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:51:43
      Would they have to split the property?
    • SPEAKER_03
    • 01:51:45
      They tried to do that before and that was not valid, right?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:51:48
      Yeah, back in 2013 they tried to do it when the demolition request was denied.
    • 01:51:56
      One of the things we didn't quite say out loud in the meeting was that, well, maybe the structure could be relocated somewhere, but that was not the request.
    • 01:52:06
      Their request was to raise the building.
    • 01:52:12
      I'm not going to have easy answers for council, but that is the process, and that's what it's intended to do.
    • 01:52:19
      And the same will likely apply to 1301 work.
    • 01:52:24
      They could go through the steps and end up, nobody buys it, nobody offers to buy it, and they buy right can raise that structure.
    • 01:52:32
      So just letting you all know that process.
    • 01:52:36
      I haven't had, Cheri, you've probably had to deal with it.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:52:38
      Riverdale.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:52:38
      Yeah, I haven't had to work with it.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:52:42
      Anyway, the representative party was concerned there.
    • 01:52:45
      We went through that process and they were able to demolish it and it doesn't exist anymore.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:52:49
      They left it in IPP.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:52:54
      I was just going to say, I think none of us want more DC districts unless the people in the neighborhoods want that, like if Belmont all of a sudden coalesced and said that
    • 01:53:05
      But I'd like for us, and maybe the Martha Jefferson Historic Conservation Renewal or whatever update is the opportunity, I'd like to revisit the individually protected properties.
    • 01:53:17
      I looked on the code as you were talking.
    • 01:53:20
      We have 75 in the city code, but two of them are no longer on there, 104 Stadium and then Riverdale.
    • 01:53:29
      Those are the only two ones that I know of that have been deep.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:53:33
      And then 415, 10th got added.
    • SPEAKER_08
    • 01:53:36
      OK.
    • 01:53:38
      So then we'd be up to 74.
    • 01:53:40
      And the number is really insignificant.
    • 01:53:43
      It doesn't matter, but we haven't added any since I was last on the BAR.
    • 01:53:49
      And I look around, and in today's environment, we would most likely want the consent of the current owner.
    • 01:54:00
      It just goes smoother that way.
    • 01:54:03
      And for instance, like 500 quarts square is not.
    • 01:54:06
      I mean, it would be difficult to demolish that, but I can see a time when somebody would buy a bunch of properties on Court Square, and it's a pretty significant property.
    • 01:54:16
      I mean, there are incredibly modest properties that are individually protected because they're really old.
    • 01:54:24
      like the Hartman's Mill.
    • 01:54:25
      There's a core of it that's old.
    • 01:54:26
      We don't even know exactly what's old, but we know it's really old.
    • 01:54:32
      And then there are very obvious properties, a lot in the mall, that are not individually protected.
    • 01:54:37
      And the Violet Crown aside, there are some significant properties in the city that would be like missing teeth if the current owner got a buyer or was interested in demolishing themselves.
    • 01:54:54
      it would, you know, this is going to happen because of this development code we adopted.
    • 01:54:58
      And I'm not saying this is a pure preservation.
    • 01:55:01
      I'm just saying, you know, that this is what we're about.
    • 01:55:05
      Um, how much do we preserve going forward?
    • 01:55:08
      How much do we fight to preserve?
    • 01:55:10
      How much do we say we don't need?
    • 01:55:12
      Um, like, you know, the Violet Crown being an example, I'm not trying to defend.
    • 01:55:18
      I literally was late for the pre-meeting because I was leaving my office.
    • 01:55:22
      I was introduced to somebody on the back porch next to mine.
    • 01:55:26
      They are people that live in North downtown and they were talking about the demolition of the Violet Crown.
    • 01:55:31
      And they said their entire neighborhood's up on, you know, because we demolished the Violet Crown.
    • 01:55:36
      I'm so tired of hearing this, you know, like any of us really wanted to demolish the movie theater and take away a viable business and destroy the downtown mall and everything.
    • 01:55:46
      But I mean, I think,
    • 01:55:47
      I'm glad you did this tonight because it explains to the public what we do and where our power comes from and how, I think, how limited it is.
    • 01:55:56
      It is.
    • 01:55:57
      And it only, you know, an application like that only comes to us when an owner brings it to us or a prospective owner who has the permission of the owner.
    • 01:56:06
      In Mr. Levine's case, we didn't initiate that.
    • 01:56:09
      We're not making a decision about the current use of the bill anymore.
    • 01:56:12
      the viability of that use or the viability of the building or anything else, you know we're in a reactive position almost passive frankly on some of these applications.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:56:23
      This is where moving forward it would be what Arlington County does and working with Kelly Brown who some of you have met, they didn't have a traditional downtown, it was a rural place and
    • 01:56:40
      They have nodes, but not really.
    • 01:56:45
      Many of their historic structures have specific preservation plans for the building.
    • 01:56:51
      So when something occurs adjacent to it, there's a
    • 01:56:56
      A special code that's used in that, and so they don't look at things as districts.
    • 01:57:03
      So one thing, Jenny Keller has floated this long ago, is that we have some really pristine places in town, and you can literally go to them and say, you know,
    • 01:57:13
      For the next 15 years, you don't have to come to the BAR.
    • 01:57:15
      Can we all agree that this is what you're going to do?
    • 01:57:19
      But I think we're at a point in time, and I know I've said it before, that if you use the term, we're squeezing jello.
    • 01:57:27
      We can't hold on to everything, and I think we really have to identify what are these really important resources and features.
    • 01:57:38
      because you end up saving everything and it almost means nothing, but we do have an opportunity to revisit it, but yes, they're clear to everybody out there.
    • 01:57:48
      You all have the power that's given to you by the city council and if someone wants to get out of a district or change something,
    • 01:57:56
      they can make that request.
    • 01:57:59
      We did have a conservation district proposed.
    • 01:58:01
      Ralph Brown wanted to create one to honor his father who built close to 200 of those cine block buildings all around town that his father built in the 50s and 60s.
    • 01:58:13
      But there's a collection of them over 12th and Rosser.
    • 01:58:19
      A conservation district was proposed.
    • 01:58:22
      You all endorsed it.
    • 01:58:23
      The Planning Commission endorsed the zoning text amendment to do it.
    • 01:58:27
      But the last step was, I've got six property owners that need to affirm that they want to be in a district and they weren't able to produce that.
    • 01:58:39
      And I had to say, I can't take this to council.
    • 01:58:43
      unless you have six people say they want to do this.
    • 01:58:46
      So that's some of that, the seriousness I think with which we take it in here is like if you want to be a district you better really mean it because it's not, I'm not going to do it for just a few.
    • 01:59:02
      And you know the first thing I say when people call me and go, well you don't understand, I go, yes I do, I have to go to the VAR myself.
    • 01:59:08
      So, you know, my house is designated, I understand it, you all are on this board because you have some relationship or connection to historic properties, certainly the two of you.
    • 01:59:19
      So, I think it's important for people to understand that.
    • 01:59:23
      I've said, I think I once even said to council that this is not some rogue group that decided, I decided to get together and decide what everybody does in the city.
    • 01:59:34
      You appointed us, you appointed them, and then you gave us these.
    • 01:59:39
      But thank you for your time tonight.
    • 01:59:41
      You were excellent students.
    • 01:59:43
      Thank you, Jeff.
    • 01:59:44
      I will create a certificate suitable for framing.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 01:59:48
      Is there a quiz we need to take now?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 01:59:52
      She's good at that, yeah.
    • 01:59:55
      I think we adjourn.
    • 01:59:57
      Pass, fail.
    • 01:59:59
      I got 13 messages from my family, like what is going on?
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 02:00:03
      Motion to adjourn?
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 02:00:05
      Adjourn.
    • 02:00:06
      So moved.
    • SPEAKER_05
    • 02:00:06
      All in favor, stand up.
    • Jeff WernerHistoric Preservation & Design Planner
    • 02:00:08
      All in favor.
    • 02:00:10
      Ron, my son's moving into a new six blocks north.